CB CalBallot

Proposition 39: Prohibits Citizens from Voting Unless They Present Government-Issued Identification. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

California Statewide • 2026

Upcoming

Official description - California Secretary of State

Invalidates mail ballots that do not have last four digits of designated government-issued identification number written on envelope. Prohibits in-person voting without presenting government-issued identification.

Official source: https://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/propositions/39/index.htm

Source captured 2026-10-08.

What your vote means

A YES vote

Voters would be required to present additional identifying information to elections officials each time they vote.

A NO vote

A voter’s identity would continue to be established with the voter’s signature.

Official voter guide · source captured 2026-10-08. Read the official overview

Official title and summary
  • Prohibits voting by mail unless voter designates a government-issued identification number for their voter registration.
  • Invalidates mail ballots if envelope does not include last four digits of a government-issued identification number matching the number designated in the voter’s registration (e.g., if voter designates Social Security number for registration, but provides driver’s license number on envelope, their ballot would not count).
  • Prohibits voting in person without presenting government-issued identification.
  • Requires elections officials to annually report percentage of each county’s voters whose citizenship status they have verified.

Prepared by the Attorney General. Read the official title and summary

Official documents

Research

Fiscal impact

Legislative Analyst’s estimate, published in the official voter guide. Read the complete analysis

Background — Legislative Analyst

Elections Administration. County elections officials administer most elections in California. As part of this work, they print and mail ballots and other voting materials to registered voters. Some state agencies also have workload related to voting. For example, the Secretary of State oversees elections across the state and prepares and mails the state Voter Information Guide .

United States Citizenship Required to Vote in Federal, State, and Almost All Local Elections A person must be a U.S. citizen to vote in any state or federal election. A noncitizen who votes in a state or federal election can be fined and/or sentenced to prison. A person must be a U.S. citizen to vote in the vast majority of local elections. (San Francisco and Oakland have a special process for people who are not U.S. citizens to vote only in school board elections if they are the parent, guardian, or legally recognized caregiver of a student in the school district.)

Voter Registration. In order to vote, people first must register with elections officials. People register to vote in the county where they live. To be eligible to register, a person must be a U.S. citizen, live in California, be at least 18 years old, not currently be in prison, and not be found unable to vote by a court. A person who makes a false statement when attempting to register to vote in California, such as by falsely stating that they are a U.S. citizen, is guilty of the crime of perjury. People can register online through the Secretary of State’s website, by mail, in person at a county elections office, or through the California Department of Motor Vehicles. A voter’s identity is established through the registration process by using their driver’s license number, state identification number, or last four digits of their Social Security number. Voters who do not provide this identifying information through the registration process may be asked to present identification the first time they vote.

Voter Rolls Maintenance. A voter roll is a list of people who are registered to vote. Elections officials are required to keep the voter rolls up to date by removing people who are no longer eligible to vote from the list. For example, elections officials receive regular updates from other government entities to identify people who have died or are in prison.

Voting. All registered voters in California receive a vote by mail (VBM) ballot. Voters can mail their ballot, drop it off at a ballot drop-off location, or vote in person at a voting location. In the November 2024 Presidential Election, about 16 million people voted in California. About 13 million voted using a VBM ballot, and about 3 million voted in person.

Voter Identification. Voters identify themselves when they vote in California. If they vote in person, they typically identify themselves by signing a list of registered voters before voting. If they vote by mail, they identify themselves by signing the envelope of their ballot. Elections officials verify signatures for VBM ballots before counting them. Elections officials generally do not verify signatures from in-person voters before counting the ballots.

California State Auditor’s Office (State Auditor). The State Auditor is an independent and nonpartisan office in state government. It reviews how well the state and local governments use money and run their programs. These reviews include performance audits to see if the government is following the law and working efficiently. The State Auditor may give recommendations to help improve government operations and efficiency. Some audits happen regularly, while others are done only once.

Figures and full document formatting are available in the official analysis.

Proposal — Legislative Analyst

Requires State and Local Elections Officials to Verify U.S. Citizenship Status of Registered Voters. Proposition 39 requires state and local elections officials to make “best efforts” using government data to verify that voters on the rolls are U.S. citizens. Proposition 39 requires elections officials to report every year the percentage of registered voters in each county whose citizenship status has been verified.

Requires Voters to Select Government- Issued Identification for Voting by Mail. Proposition 39 requires new and existing voters to select a government-issued identification in their voter registration to vote by mail.

Requires Voters to Provide Additional Identifying Information to Vote. Proposition 39 requires voters to provide additional identifying information each time they cast a ballot in any election in California. Elections officials would be required to verify voters’ identities before counting their ballots. The identification requirement would depend on whether a voter casts their ballot in person or by mail: In-Person Voting. When voting in person, Proposition 39 requires voters to present government-issued identification for identity verification. Voting by Mail. When voting by mail, Proposition 39 requires voters to provide the last four digits of their selected government-issued identification number on the ballot envelope. Elections officials would verify that the identification numbers provided on the ballot envelope match the voter’s registration information.

Creates New State-Issued Voter Identification Card. Proposition 39 requires the state to provide a voter identification card at no cost to voters who request one. The voter identification card could be used as the government-issued identification that verifies a voter’s identity when voting.

Requires State Auditor to Audit State and County Election Compliance Regularly. In every odd-numbered year, Proposition 39 requires the State Auditor to report how well the state and each county comply with the measure and make recommendations for improvement.

Requires Legislative Action for Full Implementation. Proposition 39 requires the Legislature to pass additional laws to implement the measure. The Legislature would need to clarify several details that are not defined in the proposition, like which forms of identification could be used and what steps would be considered best efforts to verify the citizenship status of registered voters.

Figures and full document formatting are available in the official analysis.

Fiscal Effects — Legislative Analyst

State and Local Costs Depend on Future Decisions. Proposition 39 would increase state and local government costs each year by tens of millions of dollars to low hundreds of millions of dollars . These costs represent less than one-quarter of 1 percent (0.25 percent) of the state’s total General Fund budget. (The General Fund is the account the state uses to pay for most public services, including education, health care, and prisons.) The exact cost would depend on future choices made by the Legislature, state departments, local governments, and voters. For example, the costs could vary depending on decisions around the design and requirements of the voter identification card and the number of cards requested. There also could be some amount of savings. These savings would be due to fewer people registered to vote—for example, due to the removal of ineligible voters or eligible voters lacking government-issued identification. These savings likely would not exceed the costs of the measure.

Figures and full document formatting are available in the official analysis.

Arguments in the voter guide

These are the authors’ advocacy statements, not impartial analysis or CalBallot endorsements. Official agencies have not checked these arguments for accuracy.

Argument for

Yes on Prop. 39 gives California a BIPARTISAN solution for VOTER ID. Supported by a solid majority of Democratic, Independent and Republican voters. Increases trust and confidence in our elections.

Argument against

No on Prop. 39. This would advance Trump’s voter suppression agenda by adding costly, unnecessary barriers that could block eligible California voters, expose personal information to identity theft, and waste hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars. Don’t let MAGA billionaires decide which voters count. Vote No.

Read the full arguments, authors and rebuttals

Supporters and opponents listed in the guide

Supporters

  • The Transparency Foundation
  • Latino American Political Assn
  • Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn
  • CA Women’s Leadership Assn

Opponents

  • ACLU California Action
  • Common Cause
  • League of Women Voters of California

These are the submitted lists in the official overview, not exhaustive lists of endorsements. “None submitted” does not mean no opposition exists.

Official voter guide · source captured 2026-10-08. Read the official overview

Campaign finance

2026 reported campaign contributions

SOS-reported contributions to primarily formed committees. These are contributions, not spending. Some committees work on several measures or transfer money to other committees; do not add these figures across measures or treat them as unique donor dollars.

In support

$15,785,413

Reported through 2026-10-06 · 1 committee(s)

In opposition

$29,637,418

Reported through 2026-10-06 · 6 committee(s)

SOS contribution totals and reporting scope · captured 2026-10-08.

Supporting committees (1)
CALIFORNIANS FOR VOTER ID, YES ON 39 (ID 1479607)$15,785,413
Opposing committees (6)

The source’s committee rows differ from its published total by $1.00. The total above is the SOS-published figure.

Top contributors by committee

FPPC list updated 2026-10-06. These lists cover qualifying committees, not every donor or all campaign money. They are not a breakdown of the SOS totals above: the sources have different reporting coverage, and even one FPPC donor amount can exceed a displayed SOS total. An asterisk (*) marks money for a committee involved in multiple measures; it cannot be allocated to this measure alone. Lists below are not added together.

Supporting: Californians for Voter ID, Yes on 39, #1479607
Richard Uihlein WI$17,000,000
Reform California with Carl De Maio - Ballot Measure CommitteeTop Contributors to Donor: Kathleen Flynn, Kathryn StarrFPPC includes multiple names in this row; the amount is not split between them here. CA$3,103,479.50
Nicole Shanahan CA$370,000
Douglas Leone CA$250,000
Stark Industrial LLC TX$250,000
Tyler Winklevoss NY$250,000
Word & Brown CA$230,000
Aubrey Chernick CA$150,000
Joshua Resnick CA$125,000
Opposing: No on 39 - Block Election Rigging sponsored by nurses, teachers, and nonprofit labor and community health clinic organizations, #1493991
California Democratic PartyTop Donors to Contributor: Election Rigging Response Act, Newsom's Ballot Measure Committee; State Building and Construction Trades Council of California Independent Expenditure PAC CA$ 3,204,703.12

The source amount has an apparent formatting error; verify it in the official filing. The source displays $2,000,0000.

SEIU California State Council for Working PeopleTop Donor to Contributor: SEIU California State Council CA$1,017,500
Reed Hastings CA$1,000,000
Dignity CA Service Employees International Union SEIU Local 2015Top Donors to Contributor: SEIU COPE (Service Employees International Union Committee on Political Education) (FED PAC ID #C00004036); SEIU Local 2015 CA$1,000,000
Western States Regional Council of Carpenters Issues CommitteeTop Donor to Contributor: Western States Regional Council of Carpenters CA$500,000
California State Council of Laborers Issues PACTop Donor to Contributor: Laborers Pacific Southwest Regional Organizing Coalition Issues PAC CA$500,000
Opposing: No on Prop 39 - Californians for Voting Rights, sponsored by California Donor Table & ACLU of Northern California, #1489007
Patty Quillin CA$1,500,000
M. Quinn Delaney CA$1,500,000
ACLU of Nothern California Issues CommitteeTop Donor to Contributor: American Civil Liberties Foundation of Northern California (501(c)(3))ACLU of Northern California Election Issues CommitteeTop Donor to Contributor: American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, Inc.FPPC includes multiple names in this row; the amount is not split between them here. CA$494,334.87
California Donor Table Issues CommitteeTop Donors to Contributor: Progressive Era Issues Committee; M. Quinn Delaney CA$132,977.41
Wendy Munger CA$100,000
Steven C. Phillips CA$50,000
ACLU California Action Issues CommitteeTop Donor to Contributor: ACLU of Northern California Issues Committee; ACLU Foundation of San Diego & Imperial Counties CA$31,083.19
Opposing: United Against Prop. 39 -- Stop the Rig sponsored by nonprofit labor and civil rights organizations, #1495206
California Democratic PartyTop Donors to Contributor: Election Rigging Response Act, Newsom's Ballot Measure Committee; State Building and Construction Trades Council of California Independent Expenditure PAC CA$2,250,000
No on 39 - Block Election Rigging sponsored by nurses, teachers, and nonprofit labor and community health clinic organizationsTop Donor to Contributor: California Democratic Party; The Tribal Council of the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria CA$2,000,000
Ronald Conway CA$500,000
Consumer Attorney's of California Issues PACTop Donor to Contributor: David Storey; Mark Boskovich CA$500,000
Opposing: Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund, #1496598
Yes on Prop 3 to Protect Public Education, Health Care and Budget Stability, Sponsored by Education and Labor OrganizationsTop Donors to Contributor: California Teachers Association / Issues PAC; National Education Association (MPO) CA$540,000*
United Domestic Workers of America Issues PACTop Donor to Contributor: United Domestic Workers of America CA$350,000*

Open the FPPC lists and methodology

This is a reporting snapshot. A contribution timeline, donor concentration and sector breakdown have not been calculated for these 2026 records. Earlier elections’ receipt totals use CalBallot’s separate historical finance dataset.

Open in the CalBallot explorer →